[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
- To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@netcom.com>
- Subject: Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
- From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 93 13:14:23 +0200
- Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 93 21:36:18 PST." <9303010536.AA10591@netcom.netcom.com>
> * To handle _abusive volumes_ through remailers, charge for remailing.
> Short term, this may be a problem, but this is the long term market
> solution.
>
> * To handle _abusive messages_ through remailers, ignore them. "Sticks and
> stones" and all that. Put positive reputation filters in place. Accept
> e-mail only through those you know or have reason to trust.
>
> As Sandy Sandfort so cogently put it, punish the perps, not the words of
> the perps. This is the basis of our society, and a good basis, too.
All this is very well for a cypherpunks-type remailer, used by a small
number of experienced users. But it doesn't apply very well to anonymous
posting/mailing services for a large number of "simple" users (services like
anon.penet.fi), nor to alt.whistleblower. Do we need to split up the
list to handle the rather diferent threads?
Julf