[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dispatches from the front lines of anonymity
- To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: dispatches from the front lines of anonymity
- From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 93 13:57:20 +0200
- Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 93 10:06:35 PST." <9302281806.AA13608@soda.berkeley.edu>
> Actually, I was thinking that whistleblower@anon.penet.fi would _be_
> the moderator. Then you just post directly. All the messages would
> come from that address, and no id's would be assigned. Since all
> messages are from "whistleblower", replies to a poster go right back
> out to the list, also anonymized.
Well, this was my original idea as well, but the ensuing discussion
confused me.
> It's actually a much simpler system than is currently implemented,
> since id's arenit involved at all.
Exactly. And it's already implemented. I just have to enable it. But it
doesn't support PGP/MIME yet.
> PGP 2.1 contains the cleartext-signature feature, and the periodic
> posting to the list should mention this. This allows a real pseudonym
> to develop, just like we want.
Agree. But this requires us to really actively distribute PGP 2.1.
Julf