[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: if this is RC4

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: if this is RC4
From: [email protected] (James A. Donald)
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 07:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Perry E. Metzger" at Sep 16, 94 09:18:15 am
Sender: [email protected]

"Ian Farquhar" says:
> > If it is, then the person who did it has gone to a lot of trouble to
> > make the source layout and coding style very similar to the publicly
> > available MD[245] sources.

Many people use this style.

Suspicious, but no fingerprint.

Perry E. Metzger writes
> One possibility is that the author may have simply decompiled the
> original code...

Decompilation would not preserve the original style.

Is "decompilation" actually the word you had in mind?


-- 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our
property, because of the kind of animals that we              James A. Donald
are.  True law derives from this right, not from
the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.                [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: if this is RC4
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
- Re: if this is RC4
  - From: "Ian Farquhar" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: if this is RC4
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: FREE patent searches
Next by Date: Re: if this is RC4
Prev by thread: Re: if this is RC4
Next by thread: Re: if this is RC4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread