[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(fwd) \"Will You Be a Terrorist?\" ( Moi? )
Other tidbits for thought:
. Optimism
It is easier to be optimistic about impending events & the
gathering dark clouds on the horizon, when one is mentally
prepared & is accoutered for dealing with a threatening
circumstance. Things don't look nearly so overwhelming the
greater your confidence that you know how to respond; when you
are prepared to meet the challenge because you have the means
to do so (or can get them) and the knowledge of how to apply
these to advantage.
. Violation
It is so telling, that legal documents on crime will always
state that violations are of "section 351, 844 (f) or (i),
1114, 1116, 1203, 1361, 1363, 1751, 2280, 2281, 2331, or
2339", or a violation of "this or any other Federal criminal
law".
They don't say that an act is an attempted violation of
"reality" or "of the sanctity of the individual" or of "the
principles of privacy" or "the values for which this Nation
stands". The words and meanings are arranged to place the
sanctity and inviolability of the State as beyond the right of
the individual to contemplate. It places the prerogative for
State functions as existing outside an individual's category of
the thought: there is no way that one could imagine the
requirements of independent existence as sovereign to the
functions of the State, as there is no allowance for, there are
no "provisions"made for, any power to act beyond what is
outlined by "the Law". That wouldn't be so bad, if The Law
was a reflection of the real world and True Intelligence.
(Barring that, it's back to the trenches. Now the trenches of
cyberspace.)
Blanc