[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tedious Chomsky arguments, some small remailer relevance.

To: jamesd@informix.com (James Donald)
Subject: Re: Tedious Chomsky arguments, some small remailer relevance.
From: chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 16:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks)
In-Reply-To: <9409222134.AA01859@carbon.informix.com> from "James Donald" at Sep 22, 94 02:34:45 pm
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

James Donald rants:
> chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen) writes an amazing article
> worthy of Chomky himself

Thank you.

Now please take your blustering somewhere where it's relevant.  Like
alt.paranoid.schizophrenics.

I'm tired of wiping saliva off of my e-mail.


--
Mark Chen 
chen@netcom.com
415/329-6913
finger for PGP public key
D4 99 54 2A 98 B1 48 0C  CF 95 A5 B0 6E E0 1E 1D

References:
- Tedious Chomsky arguments, some small remailer relevance.
  - From: jamesd@informix.com (James Donald)

Prev by Date: "Legitimate" needs of LE (Was Re: (Fwd) Internet Security: Secure Communications Over Untrusted Networks)
Next by Date: OK, *THIS* IS MY LAST WORD...HONEST
Prev by thread: Tedious Chomsky arguments, some small remailer relevance.
Next by thread: Re: The Crime Bill - text re intent requirement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread