[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another view of the CFP

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Jim Gillogly" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Another view of the CFP
From: "Harry Shapiro Hawk" <[email protected]>
Date: 8 Sep 1956 23:08:05 U
Sender: [email protected]

The White House Guy wrote:
- Clipper-encrypted messages may be further encrypted with another
  cryptosystem.  However, messages may not be encrypted before being
  encrypted with Clipper.


I can understand why they would want to do this as a policy.

e.g., they can see who is using other encryption

1) Was he saying they would make this the law?

2) Is there any technical reason it should be this way?
Harry Shapiro Hawk
Manager of Computer Services
Warwick Baker & Fiore              [email protected]

Index(es):
- Date
- Thread