[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
use of ripem instead of pgp
> RIPEM is Mark Riordan's public-key program. It is similar to PEM, but does
> not use the PEM certificates and therefore does not require people to have
> their keys signed by an agency. It is not really PEM compatible. It does
> use the RSAREF public-domain encryption package, so it is legal for non-
> commercial use in the U.S. and Canada.
>
> What I suggested was the use of RIPEM since it is available now, is legal,
> and is free.
>
> Note, though, that whether RIPEM or PGP is used, they are only for non-
> commercial use. A remailer that wanted to charge, such as the ones that
> Eric Messick is discussing, would probably have to license the technology
> from PKP directly to be legal. (I'm not sure whether PEM also is limited
> to non-commercial use.)
>
> Hal Finney
> [email protected]
Since the only reason we are talking about RIPEM is because of legality
concerns about PGP, I thought I'd mention that it is (at least theoretically)
illegal to export RIPEM from the US, annd therefore could not be legally used
to correspond with persons overseas.
I don't know if there is a legal way to do public key cryptography between
persons inside the US and persons outside the US.
----- Brian McBee ----- (503)378-4276 ----- [email protected] -----
----- Oregon State Library, State Library Building, Salem, OR 97310 -----
Plan globally, attack locally