[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes

To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
From: Eric Fogleman <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 93 13:49:01 EST
Cc: [email protected]

(Thug writes)

> According to what I read it seems that the whole issue of cellular radio
> signal encryption is really a non-issue.  They could have the most secure
...
> What makes you think they don't have the same kind of REMOB/BLV capability
> to the cellular telephone switches?  I mean, if a conversation is scrambled
...

If getting around GSM encryption is no problem, then why are governments
pushing the issue?

Eric Fogleman

Follow-Ups:
- RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
  - From: [email protected] (Murdering Thug)
- 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
  - From: Eric Hughes <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: A Bug?
Next by Date: Re: `Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
Prev by thread: RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
Next by thread: RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread