[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: toad.com mailing list postings from possible virus authors
> Subject: Re: toad.com mailing list postings from possible virus authors
> From: [email protected] (Keith Petersen - MACA WSMR)
> Content-Type> : > text>
> Content-Length: 2643
> X-Lines: 59
> Status: RO
>
> John, by quoting and reposting without my permission, my private
> message to you to a public mailing list you have violated the Federal
> Communications Privacy Act of 1986.
>
> PUBLIC LAW 99-508--OCT. 21, 1986
>
> TITLE II--STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICA-
> TIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS
>
> ss. 2702. Disclosure of contents
>
> "(a) Prohibitions.--Except as provided in subsection (b)--
> "(1) a person or entity providing an electronic
> communication service to the public shall not knowingly
> divulge to any person or entity the contents of a
> communication while in electronic storage by that service;
> and
> "(2) a person or entity providing remote computing
> service to the public shall not knowingly divulge to any
> person or entity the contents of any communication which
> is carried or maintained on that service--
> "(A) on behalf of, and received by means of
> electronic transmission from (or created by means of
> computer processing of communications received by
> means of electronic transmission from), a subscriber
> or customer of such service; and
> "(B) solely for the purposed of providing storage or
> computer processing services to such subscriber or
> customer, if the provider is not authorized to access
> the contents of any such communications for purposes
> of providing any services other than storage or
> computer processing.
Keith,
Maybe you should read more carefully...
> "(b) Exceptions.-- A person or entity may divulge the
> contents of a communication--
> "(1) to an addressee or intended recipient of such
> communication or an agent of such addressee or intended
> recipient;
> "(2) as otherwise authorized in section 2516,
> 2511(2)(1) , or 2703 of this title;
> "(3) with the lawful consent of the originator or an
> addressee or intended recipient of such communication, or
> the subscriber in the case of remote computing service;
I think John is the "intended recipient of such communication"
as I am also an "intended recipient" of this communication
from you, which I will post to cypherpunks so others can see
what kind of person you are. If your intention is to "threaten"
with this kind of foolishness, then I must warn you, I consider
this type of behavior harassment due to the confrontive nature of
your post. Let it go on record that I don't expect to be harassed,
intimidated or "threatened" and I think the Internet rules are
VERY clear about this type of behavior.
Geoff White (GW67)
[email protected]