[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defending Free Speech and Liberty (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> From [email protected] Fri Feb 19 11:55:16 1993
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Defending Free Speech and Liberty
> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Feb 93 23:14:44 PST."
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 93 12:10:23 -0700
> From: "L. Detweiler" <[email protected]>
> X-Mts: smtp
>
> [t.c. May]
> >I say, let's expand the scope of the Cypherpunks list to include more
> >discussion of viruses. We can't let it become a monopoly of the Authorities
> >(the Brunner Authority instead of the Turing Authority?)
>
> I say, unless it has to do with cryptography, please don't. Does
> anybody else want a lot of virus articles on this list? I found the
> original thug article a bit questionable, as I said. But a new list
> (viruspunks?) might be a good idea.
>
Count a vote in for viruspunks... I too wish to keep cipherpunks clean
even though I love viruses and I wish to have a pure thread about
applied crypto and anonymity techniques...
--