[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: anon.penet.fi remailers
> I balk at Yet-More-F******-Header-Lines (YMFHL) but a _possible_ patch
> is to have a:
>
> X-Show-My-Anon: yes|no (in the header),
>
> or:
>
> ::
> X-Show-My-Anon: yes|no (in the body)
Yes. Thinking about something like this. But what is teh best syntax?
> (BTW I saw someone's .sig where they *advertised* their anon id on USENET.
> Presumably this was because he thought thats what you had to do so others
> could email them anonomously... obviously he wont be a whistle blower :)
Well, it could be somebody who doesn't care about his/her own anonymity,
but wants to make it as easy as possible to send anon mail to him/her.
It's so much easier to mail to [email protected] than to use stuff
like user%[email protected] or hack around with strange extra
X-Anon-* headers (especially with anally-retentive mailers etc.).
Julf