Cypherpunks Date Index for 1993 03



  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: CFP Costs Too Much!
  • Re: more annoying philosophizing on anonymity
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • RISKS for alt.whistleblowers
  • Re: a few opinions, unasked
  • Pgp with MH & MIME
  • Re: RISKS for alt.whistleblowers
  • Re: Infrastructure
  • Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • Re: header field indicating an anonymous address
  • Re: dispatches from the front lines of anonymity
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: dispatches from the front lines of anonymity
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Re: anon user on cypherpunks list
  • Re: anon user on cypherpunks list
  • Mail server for PGP sources
  • RE: CFP Costs Too Much!
  • anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • A novel (?) return address idea
  • anon.penet.fi hacking
  • anon.penet.fi hacking
  • anon.penet.fi confusion
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • Piercing anonymity and censorship
  • Re: CFP Costs Too Much!
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: anonymity + untraceable digital money = potential problems
  • UNSUBSCRIBE
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • ideas on an encrypted BSD filesystem (LONG, technical)
  • Re: ideas on an encrypted BSD filesystem (LONG, technical)
  • she's at it again :-)
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: anonymity + untraceable digital money = potential problems
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • cryptographic activism
  • Yanek Martinson <[email protected]>
  • volume
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: anonymity + untraceable digital money = potential problems
  • Libel UK
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • tapping
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • anon.penet.fi hacking The next revision of the remailer will have something like
  • anon.penet.fi hacking
  • TIME magazine article about cyberpunks
  • Re: she's at it again :-)
  • Yanek Martinson
  • Re: Dining Crypto -- An Introduction
  • RE: she's at it again :-)
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • RE: she's at it again :-)
  • Re: ideas on an encrypted BSD filesystem (LONG, technical)
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: TIME magazine article about cyberpunks
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Textual Analysis
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • anarchism (was: Re: Dining Crypto -- An Introduction)
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • tapping
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • Re: tapping
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • No Subject
  • No Subject
  • Textual analysis
  • Re: tapping
  • Re: Textual analysis
  • tapping
  • 976-OVERDOSE
  • Re: A novel (?) return address idea
  • PGP distribution
  • Poor Man's Time Release Crypto
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: 976-OVERDOSE
  • META: prefixes for easy filtering
  • anarchism (was: Re: Dining Crypto -- An Introduction) (fwd)
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • ANON: Textual analysis
  • Re: Piercing anonymitiy and censorship
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Mailing request.
  • REMAIL: Usage stats.
  • Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • ANON: Re: anon.penet.fi hacking
  • Let's look at this ....
  • Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • implementing positive reputation systems
  • more ideas on anonymity
  • Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • ANON: Revealing identities
  • ANON: Textual analysis
  • Just came back.. (fwd)
  • Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: META: Support for prefixes
  • Re: ANON: Textual analysis
  • more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • implementing positive reputation systems
  • Unsubscribe
  • Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Wasted BAndwidth
  • No Subject
  • Let's look at this ....
  • REMAIL: Juries...
  • Re: Wasted BAndwidth
  • Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • Re: Let's look at this ....
  • You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Let's look at this ....
  • REPS: Filters Against Unwanted Messages
  • Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • ANON: My remailer
  • PGP: Help!
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: ANON: My remailer
  • Re: ANON: My remailer
  • ANON: Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • ANON: un-filterable pseudonyms
  • REMAIL: updated list
  • SOCIETY: crypto impact
  • You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • SOCIETY: crypto impact
  • META/PERSONAL: Thanks for mailing.
  • PGP: informal faq for eknipp
  • a /etc/magic for the unix file command
  • ANON: anon policy of UB
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: ANON: My remailer
  • what is all o f this talk
  • Re: a /etc/magic for the unix file command
  • A anon remailer addressing suggestion
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: ANON: My remailer
  • FWEE!: Whistleblower progress update
  • Diffie-hellman
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: SOCIETY: crypto impact
  • Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • PGP: removed from UB
  • FLAME: Defending unpopular views
  • re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • ANON/ANNOUNCE: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and high schools)
  • ANNOUNCE/ANON: Posting in alt.cyberpunk
  • Re: ANNOUNCE/ANON: Posting in alt.cyberpunk
  • Re: ANON/ANNOUNCE: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and high schools)
  • unsubscribe
  • CASH/REMAIL: combination
  • Please unsubscribe me
  • ANON: My remailer
  • Handling Abuses of Remailers
  • ANON: Textual analysis
  • Re: more ideas on anonymity
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Privacy awareness (Was: Cypherpunks priorities)
  • Re: ANON: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and HS)
  • Re: ANON: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and HS)
  • Re: ANON: Textual analysis
  • ANNOUNCE: Boston-area cypherpunks meeting?
  • Privacy awareness (Was: Cypherpunks priorities)
  • ANNOUNCE: Huntsville/Atlanta-area cypherpunks meeting?
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Unsubscribe me!!!!
  • Re: ANON: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and HS)
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • ANON: Sysadmin policies at universities
  • MISC: Internet Talk Radio
  • You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • ANON: Sysadmin policies at universities
  • UCS Computing Usage Policy.
  • Re: Wasted BAndwidth
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • Re: ANON: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and HS)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Boston-area cypherpunks meeting?
  • Revocation of key...
  • Re: MISC: Internet Talk Radio
  • ANON POLICY: was I`m not
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Re: ANON POLICY: was I`m not
  • VOICE PRIVACY: Internet av phones
  • yet another remailer
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • USENET: musings on a new MUSENET
  • CASH/REMAIL: combination
  • No Subject
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Boston-area cypherpunks meeting?
  • Internet radio
  • Kill lines
  • Re: ANON: Sysadmin Policies at Universities (and HS)
  • One last time Re: CFP Costs Too Much! (long)
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: Boston-area cypherpunks meeting?
  • No Subject
  • ACT NOW!
  • Re: F-117A Nighthawk pseudo"revelation".
  • FWEE!: Premature Ejaculation
  • MEETING: CFP>$!
  • Pgp 2.2 is out
  • Fw: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier
  • pgp 2.2
  • Pgp 2.2 is out
  • Mailer weirdness
  • Mailer weirdness
  • Re: Pgp 2.2 is out
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • PGP v2.2
  • Re: Encrypted voice protocol?
  • Re: Pgp 2.2 is out
  • PGP 2.2 is hard to find...!
  • Clinton/Gore and Commerace vs. State...
  • LISTBIZ: Mailer weirdness
  • LISTBIZ: metaprefixes update
  • PGP 2.2 is also available at
  • Need telnet access
  • Re: PGP 2.2 is hard to find...!
  • PGP: MacPGP v2.2 is GO!
  • Fwd: cyberspace, congressional hearings
  • You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • VOICE: Encrypted V. protocol
  • zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Re: zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Re: zip version for pgp2.2?
  • PGP: zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Fwd: cyberspace, congressional hearings
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Questions about PGP 2.2 compilation messages
  • Re: PGP: zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Re: Questions about PGP 2.2 compilation messages
  • Re: PGP: zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Re: Questions about PGP 2.2 compilation messages
  • NSA TApping
  • March 1993 Communications of ACM Denning on Encryption
  • FWEE!: F-117A post considered harmful
  • Hidden encrypted messages
  • FWEE!: Re: F-117A post considered harmful
  • Steve Jackson Games - Legal issues resolved?
  • zip version for pgp2.2?
  • Re: March 1993 Communications of ACM Denning on Encryption
  • Re: FWEE!: F-117A post considered harmful
  • Hidden encrypted messages
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • MEET: San Diego Trip in my future
  • CRYPT: Dingaling Denning & random # generators
  • F-117A Nighthawk post--Conclusions of Experiment
  • Re: FWEE!: F-117A post considered harmful
  • Re: F-117A Nighthawk post--Conclusions of Experiment
  • FWEE!: Markoff/NYT/VoiceCrypt
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • PGP Tutorial Gone.
  • University Policies
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: PGP Tutorial Gone.
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • Re: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • CYPHER: Plain encypher
  • Re: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • cypherpunks-request mail is ignored
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • FW: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: Hidden encrypted messages
  • No Subject
  • HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • [CRYPT: Dingaling Denning & random # generators]
  • spread spectrum; secret sharing
  • Re: [CRYPT: Dingaling Denning & random # generators]
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Tagging data to detect thieves
  • CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • UNSUBSCRIBE
  • Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!!
  • HABRECHT=EMAIL HARASSEMENT
  • Re: [CRYPT: Dingaling Denning & random # generators]
  • Re: HABRECHT=EMAIL HARASSEMENT
  • Cypherpunks know they're cool
  • CASH/BANK: combo
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Tagging data to detect thieves
  • CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • Cypherpricks think they're cool
  • Unacceptable behaviour by ghabrech
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • Unacceptable slander by dclunie
  • Secret messages in images...
  • Unacceptable slander by dclunie
  • REMAIL: help with utter.dis.org
  • Re: Unacceptable slander by dclunie
  • Re: Unacceptable slander by dclunie
  • FW: Hiding Encrypted Messages
  • Re: Cypherpricks think they're cool [FLAME]
  • Re: Unacceptable slander by dclunie [FLAME]
  • Re: REMAIL: help with utter.dis.org
  • Re: UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!!
  • Re: HABRECHT=EMAIL HARASSEMENT
  • Re: Cypherpricks think they're cool [FLAME]
  • An Appeal to Calm
  • Re: Unacceptable slander by dclunie [FLAME]
  • Re: UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!!
  • No Subject
  • Re: An Appeal to Calm
  • [FLAME] (Was Re: UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!!)
  • Re: University Policies
  • MISC: steganography & pics
  • Re: Returned mail: User unknown
  • Re: Cypherpunks know they're cool
  • Re: Unacceptable slander by dclunie [FLAME]
  • Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • Re: UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!!!
  • FWEE! premature testing
  • Re: Cypherpunks know they're cool
  • Re: Cypherpunks know they're cool
  • Re: An Appeal to Calm
  • Re: HIDE: embedding msgs into snd & graphics
  • CYPHER: Plain encypher
  • Re: Cypherpunks know they're cool
  • HIDE: embeddin msgs into snd & graphics
  • alternate US site for pgp22
  • HIDE (Fnord): Targa-24/YUV/D-xxx and headers
  • Re: HIDE: embeddin msgs into snd & graphics
  • [detecting interesting lines to look at]
  • Re: warning to "sci" anonymous posters
  • Re: Threat of restoring the status quo
  • Community standards for email anonymity
  • PGP: PGP & WAFFLE??
  • soda.berkeley.edu
  • We have a verdict. (fwd)
  • crypto poem
  • Re: Community standards for email anonymity
  • volunteers and standards
  • Re: alternate US site for pgp22
  • PGP 2.2
  • news.admin.policy: A Report From the Front
  • the recent mailing list flames
  • news.admin.policy: A Report From the Front
  • Re: news.admin.policy: A Report From the Front
  • Re: news.admin.policy: A Report From the Front
  • Re: [cleaned-up] University Policies
  • PGP: Mac PGP 2.2 available at UMich ftp
  • CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
  • The new welcome message, for your general information
  • HUMOR: Manifesto anyone?
  • RANTS: A Cypherpunk's Manifesto
  • ADMIN: ftp site
  • pgp2.2 in cypherpunks
  • GOV: DMS PreMSP
  • RE: the recent mailing list flames
  • White House
  • Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • HASH: cryptanalysis of MD5? (fwd)
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • a steganographic test
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: Cypher: Subject naming proposal
  • Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
  • POLI/TECH/SURVEY: Feds and computers.
  • CYPHER: Problems with pgp2.2 ELM scripts?
  • Re: Cypher:Subject naming- SUMMARY
  • Anonymity in the real world
  • Re: CYPHER: Problems with pgp2.2 ELM scripts?
  • We need a FAQ.
  • HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • We need a FAQ.
  • Future Copy
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Problems with pgp elm scripts.
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • yr mailing list
  • Looking for key-signers in DC
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Idea
  • Re: META: Support for prefixes
  • Re: Idea
  • Double messages
  • Re: Idea
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Re: Idea
  • Re: Idea
  • Re: Encrypted computing questions
  • Re: Idea
  • another remailer goes on line
  • your note on sci.crypt
  • REMAIL: Anon.penet.fi no more
  • FWEE! premature testing
  • Re: HIDE: embedded msgs in grphics & snd
  • Legal Net Monthly Newsletter
  • Idea
  • REMAIL: Anon.penet.fi no
  • Re: REMAIL: Anon.penet.fi no
  • anon.penet.fi bites the dust
  • Call for Submissions: Autonomedia
  • anon.penet.fi bites the dust
  • FREE: warning to "sci" anonymous posters
  • Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • A New Usenet...
  • Tropical Libertaria
  • ANON: Anon.penet.fi no more
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • ARMM?
  • Distributed anonymous posting (was Re: Many Important Items...)
  • REMAIL: Whence Remailers?
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Add Me to the List
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • New key
  • Re: FREE: warning to "sci" anonymous posters
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • REMAIL: cypherpunks strategy
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • No Subject
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: A New Usenet...
  • ANON: Anon.penet.fi no more
  • Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: A New Usenet...
  • Distributed anonymous posting (was Re: Many Important Items...)
  • Many Important Items in the News
  • To be a bit more clear
  • REMAIL: cypherpunks strategy
  • Many Important Items in the News
  • anon.penet.fi bites the dust
  • there ain't no usenet "backbone"
  • Re: REMAIL: cypherpunks strategy
  • Anonymity, accountability, and control
  • help with pgp 2.2
  • Re: REMAIL: cypherpunks strategy
  • Re: help with PGP 2.2
  • TEMPEST in a teapot
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • REMAIL: list of remailers 3/26/93
  • Remailers
  • Re: Anonymity, accountability, and control
  • Re: there ain't no usenet "backbone"
  • Re: A New Usenet...
  • hmm
  • Re: Anonymity, accountability, and control
  • ANON: Shutdown of Anon.penet.fi
  • re: new usenet
  • To Digest or Not To Digest
  • Anonymous Corollary...
  • ANON: Shutdown of Anon.penet.fi
  • PGP: Elm patch question
  • Re: new usenet
  • Mac app: trash helper 1/1
  • REMAIL: send-mail.c (alpha version)
  • Re: TEMPEST in a teapot
  • Re: Anonymous Corollary...
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Anonymity, accountability, and control
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: Anonymity, accountability, and control
  • REMAIL: sendmail.cf problems
  • Re: ANON: Shutdown of Anon.penet.fi
  • How secure is an anonomous mail-server
  • Re: How secure is an anonomous mail-server
  • Re: ANON: Shutdown of Anon.penet.fi
  • we need a faq.
  • Re: we need a faq.
  • Remailers
  • Many Important Items in the News
  • Availability of filtering scripts
  • Comments on anonymous servers
  • Re: your note on sci.crypt
  • PGP: Key Updates
  • REMAIL: "Stealth" Remailers
  • Re: How secure is an anonomous mail-server
  • Distributed distribution of PGP 2.2
  • PGP key
  • Re: TEMPEST in a teapot
  • ANON: Mark anon. posts a
  • REMAIL: Anon. remailers
  • REMAIL: Anon. remailers
  • Re: TEMPEST in a teapot
  • Speaking of TEMPEST....
  • Re: ANON: Shutdown of Anon.penet.fi
  • Re: Speaking of TEMPEST....
  • ANON: real-person newsgroups
  • Re: Speaking of TEMPEST....
  • ANON: real-person newsgroups
  • ANON: Mark anon. posts a
  • REMAIL: "Stealth" Remailers
  • alt.hackers post
  • alt.hackers post
  • Penet.fi replacement up
  • Re: REMAIL: "Stealth" Remailers
  • a blackmail opportunity
  • anonymous services
  • PGP Secure?
  • Re: PGP Secure?
  • UUNET connections
  • PGP: Improvements needed.
  • Re: PGP Secure?
  • anonymous services
  • a blackmail opportunity
  • anon email/caller id
  • Re: PGP Secure?
  • discount datacom rates?
  • Anybody out there?
  • Re: discount datacom rates?
  • ANON: UUNET Info.
  • FWEE!: Supreme Court news
  • FWEE! latest WB news/ideas
  • Re: Many Important Items in the News
  • Re: ANON: Mark anon. posts a
  • Another UUCP service provider
  • REMAIL: Filters for copyright?
  • subscribe
  • Re: a blackmail opportunity
  • Revealing identities
  • No Subject
    • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.3