[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
From: [email protected] (E. Dean Tribble)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 14:22:07 PST
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Johan Helsingius's message of Mon, 01 Mar 93 13:54:58 +0200 <[email protected]>

	 IMHO a remailer operator should *NEVER* reveal any identities, but I
	 also believe very strongly that especially if you provide a way to post
	 news articles, there has to be a way to send replies to the original
	 sender. Thus a remailer must maintain mapping info.

I like this.  Does it make sense (and has it already been talked
about?) to preserve the return information only for a limited time?

dean

References:
- Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
  - From: Johan Helsingius <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: more ideas on anonymity
Next by Date: ANON: Revealing identities
Prev by thread: Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
Next by thread: Re: Future of anonymity (short-term vs. long-term)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread