[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for anon chaining
I write:
> > This seems to me to be a very robust pseudonymous mail system which
> > could be implemented by relatively minor changes to the existing Cypherpunk
> > remailer structure.
Eli <[email protected]> writes:
> This appears to be the ARA system that was previously suggested,
> which I was speaking of using with penet. Your comment that changes
> would be needed implies that it is different; if so, could you
> clarify the difference?
No, evidently I wasn't reading carefully enough. These do appear
to be the same.
> The reason Eric suggested hanging this off the side of a pseudonym
> server is that it is rather inconvenient in its pure form,
Although I would suggest making the raw data available to those who
wish to bypass the nym server for some reason. Say, a
"Request-Routing-Header <anon_id>", command. Although I imagine
you guys have your hands full getting even a basically functional
version up.
-- Will