Re: Crypto anarchy in a VW? (not the bug)

[Jim McCoy <mccoy@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>]

Skye Merlin Poier writes:
[...]
> Also, a while back someone mentioned in passing buried cables.. this
> stirred up an old idea I had about server anonimity, that is that the
> actual physical location of a server would be very difficult to pin
> down... the only way to do this with any real degree of security would be
> to bounce signals off a satellite  but this would be rather costly...

Try this idea out:  several machines agree to "host" a server.  Each machine
runs a virtual-server process that communicates with the other
virtual-server programs.  These programs then combine to run the actual
server (a sort of shared virtual multi-processor).  The server itself _has
no physical existence_ and could operate as long as only one of the hosts
is able to spare it some CPU and memory slices.  The "server" would
basically consist of it's instruction packets being bounced around the net.

Secure crypto communication between the "processors" with some reflectors
scattered around the net to provide easy access points for those wanting to
use the services and you have a service that doesn;t really exist, at least
not as far as current legal definitions go...  :)

jim