[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Weak stenography.

To: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Weak stenography.
From: J. Michael Diehl <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1993 00:54:38 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Timothy C. May" at Jun 16, 93 11:47:35 pm

According to Timothy C. May:
> > (very) weak stenography.  By "informed," I mean that the intruder has reason
> 
> I dislike spelling flames, but you consistently misspelled
> "steganography" as "stenography," which is what a secretary does.
> 
> Thought you might want to watch out for this in future postings.

You may dislike them, but I sure appreciate it.  Thanx.  I can do a lot of 
things; spelling isn't one of them.
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-)  | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY |
| [email protected] |   But, I was mistaken.      |available|
| [email protected]   |                             | Ask Me! |
| (505) 299-2282        +-----------------------------+---------+
|                                                               |
+------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+
|            Politically Incorrect!"   <Me>                     |
+-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+
+----Is Big Brother in your phone?  If you don't know, ask me---+

Prev by Date: Weak stenography.
Next by Date: Binaries
Prev by thread: Weak stenography.
Next by thread: Re: Weak stenography.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread