[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chained remails
* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS
Uu> The problem may be the Fidonet addressing. Many times I have tried to
Uu> send mail to people with mailing addresses like M's, and not had the
Uu> mail get through. I don't know what the rules are but perhaps some
Uu> systems can get it and some can't.
Note that _this_ message goes through an RBBS/UUCP gate. The problem
remains, however. On the other hand, I just noted a sheepish message
about the [email protected] being ill for the past couple of weeks,
which would explain my failures with that system.
Uu> I'd suggest to M. that he take one of the systems that does respond to
Uu> his remailing requests, and have that be the LAST one in a chain of
Uu> two. So, he could send to, say, [email protected], and follow
Uu> that with [email protected]. Perhaps this would get through:
An interesting experiment I shall try today, perhaps with this very
message. Thank's, Hal, for the input. I should like to see these
remailers popularized, along with encryption, as one of the best
political moves we cypherpunks can make. De-glitching them for broader
use may be a thankless task, but would be worth it if it results in
their general use.
Uu> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
P.S.: Have you heard anything of the alleged bug with version 2.3 being
unable to verify plaintext PGP signatures?
*********************************************************************
* <[email protected]> - PGP Key D30909 via servers *
* > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <*
* > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <*
* > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <*
*********************************************************************
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--
M. Stirner - via RBBS-NET node 8:914/201
INTERNET: [email protected]