Re: Remailer at rebma.mn.org

[nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu]

> * Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS
> 
>  Uu> My apologies to anyone who has tried to use the anonymous remailer at
>  Uu> rebma.mn.org in the past several weeks.
> 
>  Uu> I  imagine that people who weren't successful were
>  Uu> experimenters who chalked up the failure to something they'd done
>  Uu> wrong.
> 
> I did, indeed!
> 
>  Uu> It's working again, now.
> 
>  Uu> Here's the PGP key.
> 
> 
> Does this remailer _require_ an encrypted header, or will it take the
> |
> |       ::
> |       Request-Remailing-To:
> |
> plaintext command?

From dmandl@lehman.com:

It is indeed working OK now.  Encryption is not required.  Good to see this
remailer back up, especially because it introduces a long delay, making traffic
analysis more difficult.  FYI, sending a message to myself (in NYC) through
this remailer, it took about 15 hours for it to come back.  This is either very
good or very bad depending on your purposes.  Bad for urgent messages, good for
more...er...sensitive applications.

   --Dave.