Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)

[cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)]

> I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
> which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
> is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.

Of course, anything, such as a certain DEC machine, could be construed as
a threat to national security...

Wouldn't want any 'foreign nationals' getting their hands on a computer,
would we...<G>