[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on remailers

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Thoughts on remailers
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 93 18:59:39 PDT
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.

  We just discussed a related issue on another list I subscribe to.  I
feel that we want accountability along with anonymity in many
circumstances.  You can deny service to 'bad apples' with out
compromising the identities of anyone who uses your service.  Not even
the identiy of the 'bad apple' need ever be know to you.  Chaum
discusses how this can be achieved cryptographicaly.  Is anyone
working on an implementation?

j'
--
                O I am Jay Prime Positive [email protected] 
1250 bit key fingerprint =  B8 95 E0 AF 9A A2 CD A5  89 C9 F0 FE B4 3A 2C 3F
 524 bit key fingerprint =  8A 7C B9 F2 D5 46 4D ED  66 23 F1 71 DE FF 51 48
Public keys by `finger jpp @hermix.markv.com' or [email protected]
Your feedback is welcome, directly or via symbol JPP on [email protected]

References:
- Thoughts on remailers
  - From: [email protected] (Christian D. Odhner)

Prev by Date: Key revoked.
Next by Date: ADMIN: [email protected] has been removed
Prev by thread: Thoughts on remailers
Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on remailers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread