[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: your mail
Thomas thus said:
>And that is where cryptographically secure models of trust comes in.
>If we are going to continue to be coherent in our future virtual world,
>we are going to have to "filter out" information which originates from
>sources which we do not have a cryptographic web of trust to.
I understand the predictament and security that it entails. However, I am
not sure as I understand you, that this is a good solution. Let's say if
everyone jumps on the cryptographic bandwagon, how does the web of trust
help out the end user who's feelings have been hurt? Or if the user is not
in the web of trust does that eliminate their information from the field?
Sorry, its late and I probably should'nt post but what the hell.
Probably get flamed in the morning.
>Does this make any sense?
I decided for about 2 weeks to accept only PGP messages as authenticated, so
to speak -- and it sucked even friends that have PGP and such would not
go in for the idea of a total security blanket.
Just my .02, probably give another .02 in the next 12 hours.
Paul
--
R O All Comments Copyright by | Technofetisht
A N Paul S. Goggin (1993) | Cypher, Cyber, Chaos
V Information Broker | Ergoflux, Interzone
E [email protected] | Carpe Diem: Stop the Clipper wiretap chip
Finger account for latest _Phrack_ | Public Key: PGP and RIPEM available
For anonymous communication:---> [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703 Protected -- Monitoring Absolutely Forbidden