Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Or

[fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)]

gtoal@gtoal.com sez-

> That was smoke and mirrors by people who understand chaos better than
> they understand encryption.  All it boils down to is a synchronised
> pair of (not very good) PRNGs.
> ...
> Forget it.  It's a dead end.

What it is is PRNGs that can synchronize without publishing their
states.  If this could be done with strong PRNGs, you'd have something.

-fnerd
quote me