[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NIST proposes software key escrow development

To: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Subject: Re: NIST proposes software key escrow development
From: khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1993 20:08:38 -0800 (PDT)
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <9309190211.AA17219@netcom.netcom.com> from "Doug Merritt" at Sep 18, 93 07:11:20 pm
Reply-To: erc@apple.com

> Not necessarily. Zero knowledge proof techniques, for instance, can be
> applied to make source code as impenetrable as one wishes. This tends to
> carry a heavy runtime overhead, of course.

Could you go into more detail on this?  Thanks!
-- 
Ed Carp, N7EKG			erc@apple.com			510/659-9560
                            anon-0001@khijol.uucp
If you want magic, let go of your armor.  Magic is so much stronger than
steel!        -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever"

Follow-Ups:
- Definition of "Zero Knowledge"
  - From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)

References:
- Re: NIST proposes software key escrow development
  - From: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)

Prev by Date: Re: NIST proposes software key escrow development
Next by Date: Re: gopher site
Prev by thread: Re: NIST proposes software key escrow development
Next by thread: Definition of "Zero Knowledge"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread