[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
>From: "George A. Gleason" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
>Message-Id: <[email protected]>
>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1993 02:34:18 -0700
>And of course it should be remembered that there is still an old drug-war
>thing on the books which allows 72 hours' interception without a court
>order. Now depending on how that's interpreted, 72 hours are a lot of
>conversations. This stuff can be used for background intelligence and
>investigation where it never winds up in court but is used to get
>information to be used in other ways. "It's what they don't tell you..."
This can't be true.
I read DERD's paper on wiretap law and she certainly didn't mention
anything like this.
You must be making it up.
:-) ?
No, :-(
- Carl