FIDONet policies

[an12070@anon.penet.fi (S. Boxx)]

>If a user sends a "private message", the user has no control over the number
>of intermediate systems through which that message is routed.  A sysop who
>sends a message to another sysop can control this aspect by sending the
>message direct to the recipient's system, thus guaranteeing that only the
>recipient or another individual to whom that sysop has given authorization
>can read the message.  Thus, a sysop may have different expectations than a
>casual user.

translated: we have a hierarchy of rights. sysop-gods have a right and
expectation to private mail. the user-peons have neither.

>Disclosing or in any way using information contained in private netmail
>traffic not addressed to you or written by you is considered annoying
>behavior, unless the traffic has been released by the author or the recipient
>as a part of a formal policy complaint.

"annoying behavior" -- what a cute PC euphemism. who's the idiot
academic who came up with that? try "moral & ethical bankruptcy" instead.

>As far as I can tell, the ability (perhaps the right) to fuss around in
>other folks' business and other folks' mail is one of the factors (along
>with the ability to create and enforce any number of rules and regulations)
>which makes people think it's fun to run a BBS.

the "paternal paranoia instinct". ask wells or kleinpaste for a lecture on it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.