[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Single Value Pseudonyms
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Single Value Pseudonyms
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1993 12:47:39 -0700
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- P1-Message-Id: US**AEROSPACE; 931001194739
- Posted-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1993 12:47:39 -0700
- Ua-Content-Id: CSI NC V3.0
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=AEROSPACE/ADMD=/C=US/ ; Relayed ; Fri, 1 Oct 199312:47:39 -0700
- X400-Received: by mta MTAASCMVE ; Relayed ; Fri, 1 Oct 1993 13:04:11 -0700
Someone posted a way to resist altered bank notes if the consumer's random
blinding factor signed by the bank wasn't really so random, by something
called (if I remember right) a "cut-and-choose" protocol.
To make things very simple for a bank, I suggest having fixed value digital
pseudonyms for each value of bank note. For example, the Bank of Hastings on
Kent would use "AU 500 mg from HoK Bank" as the user name for all signed 500
milligram gold certificates.
When a merchant or ultimately the bank verifies the note, it will see
"AU 500 mg" as the message, or will not accept it. No worry about spoofing.
Kent - <[email protected]>