[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANON: mail concerns
On Wed, 3 Nov 1993 [email protected] wrote:
> >::
> >Request-Encryption-To: X
> >
> >If user ID X is on the remailer's pubkey ring, the outgoing message is
> >encrypted to X. This could be usefull for anonymous return-address blocks.
>
> Encryption should be the default. Err on the side of caution.
>
What if the "To" address has more than one key associated with it? Maybe
even more than one entity? Another (not publicized) remailer?
Maybe this wouldn't be a problem. Hmmm.....
Happy Hunting, -Chris
Christian Douglas Odhner | "The NSA can have my secret key when they pry
[email protected] | it from my cold, dead, hands... But they shall
pgp 2.3 public key by finger | NEVER have the password it's encrypted with!"
My opinions are shareware. To register your copy, send me 15$ in DigiCash.
Key fingerprint = 58 62 A2 84 FD 4F 56 38 82 69 6F 08 E4 F1 79 11
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.3
>
> iQCVAgUBLNgXzIjvfLxJbYYtAQEK4AP9HrSaMSOnlsxzEjgLbAgvsCSw3vMxLJ4u
> 856ZbKI2cZTNLoPzyWLNW68gZ7kcNeaF7MHKzWbI9tLEDePpWN34sB11wBlpfzcf
> WzcYVLI6JBLVERq2seyKU3cqAhWuxldSDeAlsKkMsrzI0tGgOaLkxCxhxn9weZf8
> 58mZeANd3sg=
> =8F9u
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----