[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
"Root Canal" questions
- To: Cypherpunks <[email protected]>
- Subject: "Root Canal" questions
- From: David Sobel <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1993 16:16:32 EST
- Organization: CPSR Washington Office
"Root Canal" questions
>In the latest CPSR update:
>> "Each FBI Special Agent in Charge's contacting key law
>> enforcement and prosecutorial officials in his/her territory
>> to stress the urgency of Congress's being sensitized to this
>> critical issue;
>
>Isn't this a violation of the Hatch Act? Either on the part
>of the agents, or on the part of the "key" officials directly
>"sensitizing" Congress, or both.
The Hatch Act applies only to "partisan" activity (i.e., electoral).
There is, however, a very real question as to whether or not the
activity we've uncovered might violate 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1913, which
prohibits the use of "appropriated funds" for lobbying purposes.
I'm in the process of looking into that. There's no way to read this
material without concluding that the Bureau was undertaking an
orchestrated, agency-wide lobbying campaign in support of the
"Root Canal" initiative.
BTW, anyone have ideas about that name!?
David Sobel
CPSR Legal Counsel