[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fractal cryptography

To: "mycal" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fractal cryptography
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1993 15:57:08 -0500
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Nov 1993 19:08:24 PST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]


"mycal" says:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 1993 19:31:09 -0500, "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> > 
> > Amateurs regularly develop systems and claim fantastic things for
> > them. They then turn out to be trivial to break. This has made people
> 
> Just to add a data point, chaos seems to be worth a look.  MIT's
> Research Lab have created new signal-processors designs based on chaos
> theroy for use in secure communication.

I've heard of them. They aren't secure. Just another example of the
same phenomenon.

Perry

References:
- Re: Fractal cryptography
  - From: "mycal" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: CIA admits Timothy May Surveillance: PHOTOS!
Next by Date: Re: Should we oppose the
Prev by thread: Re: Fractal cryptography
Next by thread: privacy/property
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread