[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BAN Detweiler(WHAT A LOON)
Earlier, [email protected] wrote:
> I THINK ITS TIME TO TAKE DETWEILER OFF THE MAILING LIST,
> HE IS CLEARLY ABUSING THE PRIVELGE OF HAVING US AS AN AUDIENCE.
> ANY OTHERS ON THIS SIDE OF THE ISSUE??
> ANON
If it's reasonably democratic, sure. But L.D. could simply re-appear as
another entity, which means all new additions to the list would have to
be 'investigated'. I don't like this idea.
The best idea to shut L.D. up is to just ignore him and his rants. Don't
reply to them, and don't talk about him. IMHO witch-hunts are low on the
list of credible actions one can take.
Matthew.
ps: I find the arguments interesting, mostly because a lot is gained by
watching how people (entities ?) argue, techniques used and so on, though
this is hardly within the cypherpunk scope of activity.
--
Matthew Gream, [email protected]
'la lutte continue' - 1968 poster