No Subject

[banisar@washofc.cpsr.org]

cpsr.digex.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 08:48:10 +0000
From: Dave Banisar <banisar@washofc.cpsr.org>
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Inman vs. crypto

> Message-Id: <9312170947.AA18162@anon.penet.fi> 
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com 
> From: an41418@anon.penet.fi (wonderer) 
> X-Anonymously-To: cypherpunks@toad.com 
> Organization: Anonymous contact service 
> Reply-To: an41418@anon.penet.fi 
> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 09:47:37 UTC 
> Subject: Re: Inman vs. crypto 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
> 
> I am almost positive Inman will be confirmed. 
> 

Boy, its a good thing that was posted anonymously. A real budding deep throat 
(grin)


More recently, Inman was quoted by John Barlow in "Decrypting the Puzzle 
Palace" as saying ' "My Answer", he said "would be legislation which would 
make it a criminal offense to use encrypted communications to conceal 
criminal activity...you could have a registry of institutios which can 
legally use cryphers. If you get somebody using one who isn't registered, 
then you go after him." '