Re: A Detweiler Lesson

[Arthur Chandler <arthurc@crl.com>]

  Dear Nick:
  Thanks for the reasoned, even-tempered, and well-researched reply. As a 
named tentacle in the SQUISH spectacular, and as a modestly frequent 
contributer to the anonymity versus responsibility threads, I believe I 
can qualify as one who has done his homework. Detweiler is not in my kill 
file -- nor are you. But as for your unsolicited 132K forward of sundry 
spams, I am depositing it where, in my considered judgement, it belongs.

                                 ______ 
                                 \     \.
                                 |`\_____\
                                 |` |    |
                    __-====-__   |  |    |
                   (~<       >~>_|  |    |
                   {~~-====--~~:  \ |    |
                   !~~------~~/----`+----/ 
                    \         \___     /
                     >------\     \  <
                    <_________________>




On Fri, 21 Jan 1994, Nick Szabo wrote:

> 
> Arthur Chandler:
> >   It's been a real education to watch some folks on this list 
> > try to crack remailers, to attempt to get into Detweiler's personal life, 
> > to threaten him with violence, etc. 
> 
> So, this is only supposed to work one way?   If someone uses remailers
> to dig into my personal life, accuse me of criminality, and threaten
> me with violence, I'm supposed to just meekly take it?!!!!!!!!
> 
> I have the feeling Arthur Chandler's another one of the "Detweiler's
> in my kill file" folks who needs a clue about what has been going on.
> I'll send him my Detweiler archive forthwith so he can do his homework.
> 
> Nick Szabo					szabo@netcom.com
>