[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clipper pin-compatible chip
David Koontz writes:
> While the clipper chip and its CCEP brethern ...
I'm sure you're right; I don't mean to claim knowledge to anythign
like this level of detail.
> Operating in a system expecting a clipper chip potentially restricts
> the keyspace.
Indeed.
> The point being that dropping an IDEA chip in is not 'plug and play'.
I believe this; my point was simply to clarify. I interpreted Tim's
note as having to do with reverse-engineering Clipper, while the
original note seemed more along the "plug and play" lines. Now that I
think about it, it's probably the case the Tim didn't misunderstand at
all, but was on a tack about how you'd pretty much have to completely
re-engineer the thing. Or something.
Seems like it'd be easier to compete with Clipper by simply building
an alternative from the ground up.
--
| GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <[email protected]> |
| TAKE TWA TO CAIRO. ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX: |
| (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |