[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: fwd: Canadian gov't eavesdropping
Mike Markley says-
> I'd be curious to see how they are going to do voice recognition on
> random conversations. Unless I am very sadly out of date you need to
> teach the pattern matcher individual voices.
I remember a story from a conference in the sixties where someone
wanted to prove the point that it's much easier to make a recognizer
for all voices if you're only looking for a certain word. So he built
a "watermelon" box. He sits this up on the podium with him and gives
his talk, which naturally at some point gets to...
"...a single word, for instance 'watermelon.'" *beep!*
Then later there's a Q&A period, of course...
A: Please step up to the microphone...
Q: You mean all this thing does is recognize the word "watermelon,"
*beep!* and that it can recognize the word "watermelon" *beep!*
no matter who says it?
A: That's right, it's an any-speaker, "watermelon" *beep!* recognizer.
Q2: Why the word... "watermelon" *beep!* exactly?
...
-fnerd *BZZZT! AAAAARRRRROOOOGAH!*
quote me
- -
cryptocosmology- sufficiently advanced communication is indistinguishable
from noise - god is in the least significant bits
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvt3niQCVAgUBLMs3K
ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2tPEot1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz
3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hSnC1R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG
sRjLQs4iVVM=
=9wqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----