[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Detweiler blocking
On Wed, 16 Feb 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> I see nothing wrong with remailer operators taking steps to prevent
> Detweiler from using their equipment against their will. This is not
> censorship. Mr. Detweiler is still free to use Usenet any way he sees
> fit. It is simply the act of saying "Mr. Detweiler can't use MY
> REMAILER any way he sees fit."
Actually, `their' is a closer word for it than `Mr' is. =o
_ . _ ___ _ . _
===-|)/\\/|V|/\/\ (_)/_\|_|\_/(_)/_\|_| Stop by for an excursion into the-===
===-|)||| | |\/\/ mud.crl.com 8888 (_) Virtual Bay Area! -===