[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remailer Musings
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Miller writes :
>
> It might be worthwhile to create a remailer package for a remailer
> that only sends to other known remailers. People hesitant about
> running a full service remailer may still be willing to run a
> behind-the-front-lines remailer.
>
This illustrates my point precisely. Look at the messages on this thread
over the past few days; questions about 'common carrier' status, legal
questions, etc reveal that there is, in practice, more to running a
'full service remailer' than just setting up the software.
Running multiple overseas remailers may complicate investigations and
legal action *for now*, but I can't help feeling that this is only a
temporary fix. [My opinion, ignore at will..]
Bill Stewart raised some concerns about whether it is possible to
forge return addresses; I am certainly not an expert, but I wonder
whether some inspired cypherpunk can come up with a way around the
technical problems involved. [Sips coffee, raises eyebrow] If 'they'
can't find the remailer operator (much less the anonymous poster),
then all these questions of culpability and risk are moot.
- --
........................................................................
Philippe D. Nave, Jr. | Strong Crypto: Don't leave $HOME without it!
[email protected] |
Denver, Colorado USA | PGP public key: by arrangement.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLbWBqgvlW1K2YdE1AQFZbQQA1MR14wbBcK2BHRe45tT9x48MFpVpPK+1
wxOlpWiYtiQgV2m/rLkYzlrSCBaTjIU5Rj1UpOK1vpwOBIJmrQH5aKEQIPmc1Quw
nw7xieKsZxe/7o6PsmZoOvIg5N+niOyRgTSyXsuQI/ycSNu0tsnAjL03B2UXkkXZ
bnCXfQMwInE=
=SAu/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----