[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cryptophone ideas

To: [email protected] (Jamie Lawrence)
Subject: Re: cryptophone ideas
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 14:01:33 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 Apr 1994 10:47:10 -0800." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Jamie Lawrence says:
> I am not sure if I am not explaining myself clearly or if you are being
> intentionally dense.
> 
> The point is that if we know our stuff, have way too much liesure time and
> are dedicated to difficult solutions, my cellular and your cellular could
> be hacked to make use of the DSP as a co/dec for what ever we wish
> it to.

Analog cellphones do not have real DSP in them. They are ANALOG you
see. The digital cellphones can't be encrypted without cooperation of
the base station.

Perry

References:
- Re: cryptophone ideas
  - From: [email protected] (Jamie Lawrence)

Prev by Date: Re: DId you ever think...
Next by Date: Re: DId you ever think...
Prev by thread: Re: cryptophone ideas
Next by thread: Re: Milgram & Authority
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread