[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The un-BBS
On Wed, 27 Apr 1994, Jim Sewell wrote:
>
> My contention is that a signature, while encrypted, is not encrypted
> to obscure the meaning. It says it is a sig, it is a sig, and contains
> no other information that is not readily available (email addresses can
> be included, but it is retrievable with a commonly available program PGP.)
A randomized signature or signature with random padding can be used as a
subliminal channel... (insert creepy music here :-)
-- Rolf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rolf Michelsen Phone: +47 73 59 87 33
SINTEF DELAB Email: [email protected]
7034 Trondheim Office: C339
Norway "On the internet nobody knows you're a dog"
----------------------------------------------------------------------