[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anonymous accusations not worth much
> The following anon msg sent to the cpunks list contained your account
> ([email protected]) as the reply to:
> Date: Thu Apr 28 00:36:57 PDT 1994
> From: [email protected]
> Reply to: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: spooks on cypherpunks
>
> NetSurfer <[email protected]>
> Robert Mathews <[email protected]> be aware
>
...
>
> Are you the sender? Do you know who the sender is? Why exactly is this
> person defaming my name with this outrageous accusation?
Cheer up, NetSurfer, as nobody takes anonymous accusations too
seriously...at least not anyboy with any common sense.
Reputations matter, and anonymous entities who provide no verifiable
info (not that many of us want to see such info, or would bother to
investigate it) have almost zero reputation. The calculus of
reputations thus means that anonymous accusations carry little weight.
There's a lot more to be said here. This issue lies close to the heart
of how crypto anarchy works.
--Tim May
--
..........................................................................
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected] | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^859433 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
"National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."