So PGP2.5 is becoming clearing...

[jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Perry E. Metzger writes:

> John E. Kreznar says:
> > You would have to consent to be a national person (United States of
> > America or Canada) in order to have it.  You wouldn't want to give up
> > your freeman status to do that, would you?

> Given that to my knowledge no court, federal official, or other
> organization that counts recognises "freeman status" to my knowledge,
> it would seem to be a very small loss.

What they certainly _do_ recognize, however, is that a person who _does_
agree to the PGP 2.5 terms has affirmed that he _is_ a national person.
This could be used by a court to negate any subsequent denial by the
person that he is a subject of the United States of America or Canada.
The absence on one's record of such affirmations is a prerequisite for
freeman status.

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdqRM8Dhz44ugybJAQFeKAP9EQPF8HucD5DUZ7x+ujnWxC4Td5uW/Wzy
6tQybwcBAwJuCenqWHDHdx5awGkANo9HTx63cD41rAls1rsXIyDRF2h2fTa1sLkM
d6Soww9JG4PUAHGLFJvu1SCt13nBzotGrEpOp16c0y9QeW9yQ+QCFSnFq2bw75F4
zi1yarlYyQo=
=Da9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----