[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 13:35:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 May 1994 12:20:19 CDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


"Robert A. Hayden" says:
> I may be foolish, but...
> 
> What if (the cypherpunk community) comes out with a secure program that 
> doesn't rely on RSAREF?  Can it be done?  

I notice that you advertise a PGP 2.3a key.

Perry

References:
- Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
  - From: "Robert A. Hayden" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Factoring with a quantum computer (Citation)
Next by Date: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Prev by thread: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Next by thread: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread