Multiple encryption

[rishab@dxm.ernet.in]

perry@imsi.com:
> Jay Prime Positive says:
> > If you suspect that some of the non DOD/NSA cyphers might be broken,
> > but you are not ready to employ one-time-pads, then you should
> > threshold you mesages into N parts so that all N are needed to recover
> > the original.  Then encrypt each part under a different cypher.
> 
> Its far simpler to encrypt your message with multiple systems, one
> after another, than to break it up in the manner you suggest, and the
> security is in fact better that way than in the manner you suggest.
> 

It's not a good idea to encrypt binaries unless you know what they are. It's
not a good idea to apply one encryption system over another unless you're
sure of what you're doing, and know the effect of the two interacting.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rishab Aiyer Ghosh                                     rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Voicemail +91 11 3760335; Vox/Fax/Data 6853410
H-34C Saket New Delhi 110017 INDIA

The National Fairness to Game Animals Association says:
                                          Support your right to arm bears!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------