[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Keep Out--The Journal of Electronic Privacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Keep Out
> The Journal of Electronic Privacy
>
> There is a well-established constitutional right to privacy in the United
> States. We have this right today because of the wisdom and forethought of our
> founding fathers.
Odd, but my copy of the Constitution (w/amendments) doesn't even contain
the word "privacy," let alone any mention of a "right to privacy." (*Damn*
these variorum editions!) There is the Fourth Amendment, of course, but
the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures is not
synonymous with the right to privacy, IMO.
I believe it was in Katz v. U.S. (1967) that the Supreme Court first
enunciated the doctrine of a "reasonable expectation of privacy." It's
interesting that it took the advent of telecommunications to bring this
issue to the fore -- Katz was a wiretapping case. Of course,
#define IM_A_LAWYER FALSE
And I may be wrong about all this, but it's too nice to stay inside and
confirm my facts. :-)
Alan Westrope <[email protected]>
__________/|-, <[email protected]>
(_) \|-' finger for pgp 2.6 public key
S,W.E.A,T! -- graffito at Moe's Pretty Good Gym
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
iQCVAgUBLfI8r1RRFMq4NZY5AQE2nQP/fanAkJfoUPRQir22aaqNDdMcIPACBi74
D/FNxG5JXlSDUxmsVZh3gsIsFUepZQYHdE5/gp2cg8iHZqaO+EyH/HSnXSXpd/4G
Vpn01XEK5rq0GJZlzS9UUhXtKPiGRTWw+xMSosoZptUfpFduuioT3ehKCIvka0nB
hxLMUVdqzEg=
=fkii
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----