[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regulatory Arbitrage
Eric writes:
> Regulatory arbitrage is an Important concept, as well as a great phrase.
> The writer is square in the middle of the mainstream in the business
> world, and note how effortlessly he speaks of avoiding governments and
> playing them off against each other.
I'm not surprised, though my perspective has perhaps been enhanced
by growing up in the land of the Delaware Corporation -
part of the advantage of Delaware was that corporate taxes were low,
but additionally the regulatory climate was friendly and there was
almost 200 years of corporate relationships with the local government,
so most disputes could be expected to be resolved reasonably fairly.
It seems that business, like the net, regards censorship and other
interference as damage, and routes around it....
> Arbitrage of regulation almost always leads to equalization, although
> the time scales are much longer. When equalization happens, it's
> almost never that the advantage decreases for the destination buyer.
No surprise here - as transportation and communication improve,
it becomes easier for buyers to buy things anywhere, from anyone,
and the pool of available suppliers increases. And buyers are stuck
with their local regulatory stupidity, but they can shop around for
sellers with less stupid regulations. Meanwhile, the leverage of
sellers with government-supported monopoly markets is decreased,
because their local markets are less captive, and foreign markets
aren't forced to buy from them; it becomes increasingly to their advantage
to leverage on their current size to outcompete external competition
while decreasing instead of increasing regulations on their businesses.
Sometimes the only way to level the playing field is to get rid
of the walls you built around it....
Bill