[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (None)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[email protected] writes:
> [email protected] (Matthew Ghio) writes:
>
>> I couldn't find alt.numbers.random, or any alt.numbers.* groups, on any of
>> the news-servers that I tried. Perhaps you need to newgroup it again.
> According to David Lawrence's Usenet listing, alt.numbers.* doesn't
> exist. Unless it was created in the last two months, officially it doesn't
> exist. But since when did "officially not existing" mean something
> actually didn't exist?
I remember that little dustup in alt.config. A single newgroup was
barraged with 9 or 8 rmgroups, along with an extra helping of flame.
FWIW, alt.numbers.random wasn't the first group proposed... it was
something like alt.numbers.interesting (followed by suggestions for
alt.numbers.odd, alt.numbers.even and so on).
Sending another newgroup will probably have as much effect as the first
one did. :-(
I suppose alt.is.doomed could be used for a pool. I can set an
automoderator daemon on it.
OBcypherpunk: Matt Blaze's paper (_Protocol Failure in the Escrowed
Encryption Standard_) is only available in Postscript format. But at
my local Kinko's, the fascist session logging utility doesn't seem to
notice that 'copy /b a:eesproto.ps prn' in a DOS Prompt window causes
printing to happen. ;-)
- --
Roy M. Silvernail -- [email protected]
"I'm a family man, model citizen."
-- Warren Zevon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3c
iQCVAgUBLf5xcxvikii9febJAQFkOgP/aSg00dUiAH5vNkZwBkGRnG+KtR8Yt2UC
diA4WrqOETDx77PG3PXJmlgfd3F6OdiJNEq175n3XcV9F0ksb9KMIFOQPB+69IDg
wTXrql7cv6K/p3muIu4t51i0ZkOCzLOadosOIowEhUW0UX/NEAdBnx77Fem0jtnW
JFMY5nFUQag=
=9nDX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----