[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another Cellular Vict

To: Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Another Cellular Vict
From: Sandy Sandfort <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 1994 08:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

C'punks,

On Wed, 22 Jun 1994, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

>    Which suggests a "stealth" phone that randomly dithers its round trip
>    delay a la GPS selective availability...
> 
> Well, I'm not sure how well that would work...  The "dither" on the
> RTT can't go negative (for obvious reasons :-) ).
> . . .

Why not?  Of course it would reveal the dithering, but your location 
would still be ambiguous.  One would assume if someone were on the run, 
there would be only minimal advantage in have a legitimate looking ping 
location.  The major emphasis would be in not getting caught.

 S a n d y

References:
- Re: Another Cellular Vict
  - From: [email protected] (Bill Sommerfeld)

Prev by Date: Groups Hail New Bill For
Next by Date: Re: e$: Geodesic Securities Markets
Prev by thread: Re: Another Cellular Vict
Next by thread: Re: Another Cellular Vict
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread