[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (None)
----------
| From: Jeff Gostin <[email protected]>
| To: <[email protected]>
| Subject: (None)
| Date: Sunday, July 03, 1994 4:08PM
|
| [email protected] (Bob MorrisG) writes:
|
| > I've heard rumors through the years that CIA/NSA/whoever can aim a
| > parabolic antenna at your window, read the electronic pulses surrounding
| > your computer, and thusly determine what you are typing. Is there any
| > truth to this?
| If this is a reference to the TEMPEST attack, yes, they can. From
| what I hear, it's trivially easy for them to do, because they have The
| Right Equipment. Rumor also suggests that that The Right Equipment isn't
| so difficult to come by. I don't pretend to understand the intricacies of
| TEMPEST, but I do know that the government requires all of their computers
| (used at any level of security above none) to be TEMPEST shielded. This
| tells us its a real concern.
|
| There are other ways to beat TEMPEST, like making it damn near
| impossible to get close enough to the computer in question to get a
| reading.
|
| --Jeff
| --
| ====== ====== [email protected]+
| == == | The new, improved, environmentally safe, bigger, better,|
| == == -= | faster, hypo-allergenic, AND politically correct .sig. |
| ==== ====== | Now with a new fresh lemon scent! |
| PGP Key Available
+---------------------------------------------------------+
|
How well does a Tempest attack work with multiple machines in the same
room? It seems to me that it would take additional equipment to filter
out the different machines that are being run. It also seems that it
should be trivial to create a noise generator that would make Tempest
useless. Kind of like using a spark plug to foil older radar guns.
Mike.
=====================================================
Mike Markley <[email protected]>
I'm not a Microsoft spokesperson. All opinions expressed
here are mine.
=====================================================