[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUT and P=NP

To: [email protected] (Ken Kirksey)
Subject: Re: GUT and P=NP
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 07:49:03 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Jul 1994 20:29:17 EDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Ken Kirksey says:
> I was reading Hawking's _Black Holes & Baby Universes_ and an interesting
> question struck me:  If a Grand Unified Theory exists, would it not 
> prove P=NP to be true?

No.

.pm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GUT and P=NP
  - From: Jim choate <[email protected]>
- Re: GUT and P=NP
  - From: Berzerk <[email protected]>

References:
- GUT and P=NP
  - From: [email protected] (Ken Kirksey)

Prev by Date: Re: Anti-Clipper Article in "THe Computer Applications Journal"
Next by Date: Re: Why triple encryption instead of split+encrypt?
Prev by thread: GUT and P=NP
Next by thread: Re: GUT and P=NP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread