[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Netcom mail delays
Tim wrote:
> Cypherpunks,
>
> Sorry I haven't been able to participate in the thread I started, but
> my own post has yet to make it here to "Notcom," and later posts are
> dribbling in out of order, without prior context, etc. (I suspect the
> problem is at Netcom's end, e.g., refusing mail, and not at Toad's
> end.)
Last night noting an absence of list mail I pinged and found
toad.com live but got no response (then) from majordomo on a
"who cypherpunks" query. Tried first at 00:30 then again at
02:00. Netcom allowed the responses to be received at 04:49
within two seconds of each other! I append the headers to
document this amazing disservice.
Since 47 of the 530 cypherpunks are netcom users, I think
the rest of the list should understand the difficulties we
face in getting posts in any timely fashion. It does make
discourse difficult.
From owner-cypherpunks Wed Jul 27 04:43:14 1994
Return-Path: <owner-cypherpunks>
Received: by toad.com id AA27614; Wed, 27 Jul 94 04:43:14 PDT
Received: from netcom.com (netcom13.netcom.com) by toad.com id AA27570; Wed, 27 Jul 94 04:42:56 PDT
Received: by netcom.com (8.6.8.1/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
id EAA10938; Wed, 27 Jul 1994 04:43:12 -0700
From: [email protected] (Harry Bartholomew)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: EMAG> TJOAUC (E-Zine) (fwd)
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 04:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1329
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%