[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUT and NP

To: [email protected] (James A. Donald)
Subject: Re: GUT and NP
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 22:08:34 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Jul 1994 16:06:17 PDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


James A. Donald says:
> If a turing machine can *perform* it, then it is an algorithm.
> 
> Since a turing machine certainly cannot perform quantum
> "algorithms", then by definition they are not algorithms.

If a turing machine can *perform* it, then it is an algorithm.

Since a turing machine certainly cannot perform Sun Workstation
"algorithms", then by definition they are not algorithms.

Perry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GUT and NP
  - From: Berzerk <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: GUT and NP
  - From: [email protected] (James A. Donald)

Prev by Date: Re: Government-Controlled Trust Hierarchies
Next by Date: RE:
Prev by thread: Re: GUT and NP
Next by thread: Re: GUT and NP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread